Synopsis. Data Guard’s capability to recover a mission-critical database upon the loss of the entire production site is at the heart of Oracle 11g’s disaster recovery features. This article – the sixth in this ongoing series – explores how to manually fail over a production database to its corresponding physical standby database, as well as reinstate a “failed” primary database to a physical standby.
The prior article in this series demonstrated:
- How to leverage Oracle 11g Data Guard Real Time Query features
- How Oracle 11g Data Guard snapshot standby database features simultaneously provide disaster recovery and quality assurance testing
This article will show how to:
- Manually initiate a failover operation when the primary database is no longer accessible
- Reinstate a failed primary database by transforming it back into a physical standby database
Pondering the Unthinkable: Failover
I don’t think I’ve ever met an Oracle DBA who’s been thrilled to discuss the possible loss of her complete production database site, even if she had simulated that loss and practiced the required steps to full database recovery. But let’s face it: Even if a DBA follows Oracle’s recommended best practices precisely to guard against data loss, there’s always a miniscule chance that the production database site could become untenable through no fault of our own. Thankfully, once an Oracle 11g Data Guard standby environment has been enabled, Oracle 11g offers excellent survivability of a production database while simultaneously insuring that any data loss is limited depending on the data protection mode selected.
It Can’t Hurt To Ask...Though it might seem to be inappropriate at the time, the first question that I’ll typically ask in an apparent failover situation is “Do we really need to perform a failover in this situation?” There may be a way around the apparent loss of the primary database, or it’s possible that the apparent disaster is really not that disastrous. For example, if the production database is unavailable for only a few moments, or maybe even an hour, during off-peak business hours, is it really a problem, or just a matter of perception and extra paperwork? The reason I’m not afraid to challenge the necessity of failover is that there are some potentially serious consequences of completing the failover operation:
- The original production database is “toast.” The primary database essentially becomes just a bunch of servers and disk drives at this point, and it may not be restorable to physical standby state until a full backup can be obtained using the new primary database as its source.
- The physical standby becomes the primary. Unless there is a second physical standby already configured, I now have a single point of failure in my production system, and my top priority must be re-establishment of the primary-standby relationship.
- The physical standby may be underpowered for peak business hours. Let’s be honest: Many organizations look upon a physical standby environment as a necessary evil in terms of hardware and licensing costs, and my new primary database may soon become overwhelmed by peak-time transaction volumes.
Detecting a Failover Situation.Once I’ve established that it’s truly necessary to continue the failover operation, I’ll use Data Guard Broker (DGB) to assist in the transition. To illustrate how DGB detects a failover situation, I’ll start with the ORCL_PRIMARY and ORCL_STDBY1 databases both fulfilling their initial intended respective roles of primary database and counterpart physical standby database. The DGMGRL utility reflects this as well, and it shows that everything is copasetic:
[oracle@11gStdby ~]$ dgmgrl DGMGRL for Linux: Version 126.96.36.199.0 - Production Copyright (c) 2000, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved. Welcome to DGMGRL, type "help" for information. DGMGRL> connect sys/oracle Connected. DGMGRL> show configuration Configuration Name: MAA_orcl Enabled: YES Protection Mode: MaxPerformance Databases: orcl_primary - Primary database orcl_stdby1 - Physical standby database Fast-Start Failover: DISABLED Current status for "MAA_orcl": SUCCESS
To simulate the necessity for a failover to the physical standby database, I’ll simply issue the kill -9 <pid> command against the Server Monitor (SMON) background process for the primary database. The primary database’s alert log detects this almost immediately, of course:
. . . Tue Aug 25 18:54:10 2009 Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/orcl_primary/orcl_primary/trace/orcl_primary_pmon_6166.trc: ORA-00474: SMON process terminated with error PMON (ospid: 6166): terminating the instance due to error 474 Instance terminated by PMON, pid = 6166 . . .
The corresponding physical standby database’s Remote File Server (RFS) background process also detects the loss of connectivity to the primary database, as reflected in that database’s alert log:
. . . Tue Aug 25 18:54:49 2009 RFS: Possible network disconnect with primary database Tue Aug 25 18:54:49 2009 RFS: Possible network disconnect with primary database Tue Aug 25 18:55:49 2009 . . .
To ascertain what’s wrong here, I’ll immediately verify the Data Guard configuration by connecting via DGMGRL and run the SHOW CONFIGURATION and SHOW DATABASE commands:
DGMGRL> show configuration verbose; Configuration Name: MAA_orcl Enabled: YES Protection Mode: MaxPerformance Databases: orcl_primary - Primary database orcl_stdby1 - Physical standby database Fast-Start Failover: DISABLED Current status for "MAA_orcl": Error: ORA-16625: cannot reach the database
Failing Over to the Physical Standby. It’s obvious that something is seriously wrong here! Once I’ve asked my usual probing questions and determined that the failover is indeed necessary, I’ll start the failover process with one simple DGB command, FAILOVER TO <standby database>:
DGMGRL> failover to orcl_stdby1; Performing failover NOW, please wait... Failover succeeded, new primary is "orcl_stdby1" DGMGRL> show configuration Configuration Name: MAA_orcl Enabled: YES Protection Mode: MaxPerformance Databases: orcl_stdby1 - Primary database orcl_primary - Physical standby database (disabled) Fast-Start Failover: DISABLED Current status for "MAA_orcl": SUCCESS DGMGRL> show database orcl_stdby1 Database Name: orcl_stdby1 Role: PRIMARY Enabled: YES Intended State: TRANSPORT-ON Instance(s): orcl_stdby1 Current status for "orcl_stdby1": SUCCESS
During the failover to the physical standby database, the Oracle 11g DGB performs the following steps:
- First, it validates that the target standby database is ready to accept the primary role. If it’s not, DGB will not allow the failover to continue until the DBA has manually resolved any discrepancies.
- It then halts the Redo Apply process (MRP0) on the target standby database once all unapplied redo has been applied successfully.
- It completes the failover to the physical standby database by opening the standby in READ WRITE MODE.
- Finally, DGB determines if there are any other physical standby databases that need to be re-enabled; it then restarts redo transport from the new primary database to any extant physical standby databases.
The corresponding alert log entries from the original standby database (now the primary database) are displayed in Listing 6.1.
Have Any Data Been Lost?As with many questions we’re asked as DBAs, the answer to this one is “It depends.” In this case, it’s going to depend on which data protection mode – either Maximum Performance, Maximum Availability, or Maximum Protection - that I’ve chosen for the Data Guard configuration. (See my prior article on this topic for a comparison on these data protection options and their corresponding effect on data loss.)
However, there’s one other factor to consider in a failover situation. The Data Guard FAILOVER TO <standby database> command also offers an optional directive, IMMEDIATE, which instructs DGB to an immediate failover instead of a complete failover, and here are the implications:
- During a COMPLETE failover (the default), Oracle 11g will attempt to recover the maximum amount of redo data based on the DG configuration's specified protection mode. After a complete failover, DGB avoids disabling any standby databases that are not the failover target. For obvious reasons, Oracle recommends using complete failover.
- During an IMMEDIATE failover, on the other hand, Oracle 11g applies no additional redo data to the standby database after the failover is invoked. While it's the fastest type of failover, it does require that the original primary database as well as all standby databases that aren't targets of the failover must be re-enabled.
Failing Over To a Logical Standby Database: Considerations.Though it’s definitely possible, I’d like to avoid using a logical standby database as a failover target:
- A logical standby doesn’t use Redo Apply to apply changes to data; instead, it uses SQL Apply just as Oracle Streams does during basic database replication. There are intrinsic limitations on which data types can accept DML for changed data, and thus not all the data in the primary database may be present in the logical standby database.
- SQL Apply can be configured to accept only selected subsets of logical change records, so even if all of a table’s data types are completely supported, not all of the changes on the primary database may have been applied on the logical standby database.
- Perhaps most importantly, once a failover to a logical standby database is complete, all other standby databases will be permanently disabled and must be recreated manually.
I’ll explore these limitations (but also highlight the features) of logical standby databases in an upcoming article in this ongoing series.
Reinstatement: Post-Failover Stress Relief
Prior to Oracle Database Release 10g, once the primary database had failed, it was impossible to bring the original primary database back into the Data Guard configuration as a new physical standby database without having to rebuild it completely. This was usually accomplished by using the new primary database as the target database and the original primary as the auxiliary database within the bounds of the DUPLICATE DATABASE Recovery Manager (RMAN) command set.
As long as certain prerequisites are in place, however, Oracle 10g offered the ability to reinstate the original primary database as a physical standby database:
- Flashback Logging must have been enabled on the original primary database. (Since this is a prerequisite for activating a physical standby database as a snapshot standby database in Oracle 11g, this requirement is usually already in place if I’m following Oracle 11g’s best practice recommendations.)
- Sufficient Flashback Logs must be present on the original primary database server to allow Flashback Database to rewind the database to a state prior to its failure.
- Finally, the original primary database must be able to communicate over the network to the new primary database and Data Guard Broker so that it can be restored properly, Redo Apply can be re-established, and it can be resynchronized with the Data Guard configuration.
Reinstating a Failed Primary Database.To reinstate my failed ORCL_PRIMARY database as a new physical standby database, the original primary database has to be shut down and then brought back to MOUNT state. Otherwise, the initial attempt at reinstatement will fail as shown below in this DGMGRL session:
DGMGRL> reinstate database orcl_primary Reinstating database "orcl_primary", please wait... Error: ORA-16653: failed to reinstate database Failed. Reinstatement of database "orcl_primary" failed
After connecting to the ORCL_PRIMARY database via SQL*Plus and issuing the STARTUP MOUNT command, I’ll again attempt to reinstate the database:
DGMGRL> reinstate database orcl_primary Reinstating database "orcl_primary", please wait... Operation requires shutdown of instance "orcl_primary" on database "orcl_primary" Shutting down instance "orcl_primary"... ORA-01109: database not open Database dismounted. ORACLE instance shut down. Operation requires startup of instance "orcl_primary" on database "orcl_primary" Starting instance "orcl_primary"... Reinstating database "orcl_primary", please wait... Reinstatement of database "orcl_primary" succeeded
The successful reinstatement of ORCL_PRIMARY as a physical standby database is reflected in the Data Guard configuration as well:
DGMGRL> show configuration Configuration Name: MAA_orcl Enabled: YES Protection Mode: MaxPerformance Databases: orcl_stdby1 - Primary database orcl_primary - Physical standby database Fast-Start Failover: DISABLED Current status for "MAA_orcl": SUCCESS DGMGRL> show database orcl_primary Database Name: orcl_primary Role: PHYSICAL STANDBY Enabled: YES Intended State: APPLY-ON Instance(s): orcl_primary Current status for "orcl_primary": SUCCESS
The corresponding alert log entries from the successful reinstatement process for the ORCL_PRIMARY database are shown in Listing 6.2.
Reverting to the Original Data Guard Configuration.Now that I’ve successfully reinstated my original primary database to a physical standby database, I’ll simply perform a switchover operation via DGB to return the original primary and physical standby databases to their initial roles in the Data Guard configuration:
DGMGRL> switchover to orcl_primary; Performing switchover NOW, please wait... New primary database "orcl_primary" is opening... Operation requires shutdown of instance "orcl_stdby1" on database "orcl_stdby1" Shutting down instance "orcl_stdby1"... ORA-01109: database not open Database dismounted. ORACLE instance shut down. Operation requires startup of instance "orcl_stdby1" on database "orcl_stdby1" Starting instance "orcl_stdby1"... ORACLE instance started. Database mounted. Switchover succeeded, new primary is "orcl_primary" DGMGRL>
In the next article in this series, I’ll explore …
- Configure the primary database and one physical standby database for Fast-Start Failover (FSF)
- Activate, monitor, and relocate the Fast-Start Failover Observer (FSFO)
- Insure against the loss of a single FSFO via Enterprise Manager Grid Control
References and Additional Reading
While I’m hopeful that I’ve given you a thorough grounding in the technical aspects of the features I’ve discussed in this article, I’m also sure that there may be better documentation available since it’s been published. I therefore strongly suggest that you take a close look at the corresponding Oracle documentation on these features to obtain crystal-clear understanding before attempting to implement them in a production environment. Please note that I’ve drawn upon the following Oracle Database 11g documentation for the deeper technical details of this article:
B28279-02 Oracle Database 11g New Features Guide
B28294-03 Oracle Database 11g Data Guard Concepts and Administration
B28295-03 Oracle Database 11g Data Guard Broker
B28320-01 Oracle Database 11g Reference Guide
B28419-02 Oracle Database 11g PL/SQL Packages and Types Reference